Skip to main content

Understanding Parliamentary Committees in India: Standing vs. Ad Hoc


In the realm of parliamentary proceedings in India, committees play a crucial role in ensuring effective oversight, scrutinizing legislation, and providing valuable insights into governmental functions. Among these committees, two primary types stand out: Standing Committees and Ad Hoc Committees. While both serve important functions, they differ significantly in their composition, mandate, and duration. 

Let's delve into the key differences between Standing Committees and Ad Hoc Committees to gain a better understanding of their roles in the Indian parliamentary system.


Standing Committees: The Pillars of Parliamentary Oversight

Standing Committees are permanent bodies established by the Parliament or State Legislative Assemblies to examine specific areas of governmental functioning on an ongoing basis. These committees endure across parliamentary sessions, providing continuity and stability in their oversight functions. Standing Committees are typically categorized based on the areas they oversee, such as financial matters, subjects like health or education, and administrative or procedural issues.


Key Characteristics of Standing Committees

Permanent Establishment: Standing Committees are constituted for the duration of a parliamentary term or assembly session, with members appointed at the beginning of each term or session.

Broad Oversight Mandate: Each Standing Committee is entrusted with a specific area of governmental functioning, such as finance, health, or agriculture. They examine legislation, policies, and expenditures related to their respective areas and provide recommendations to the Parliament or Legislative Assembly.

Continuous Operation: Standing Committees operate throughout the parliamentary term, conducting inquiries, scrutinizing bills, and presenting reports on a regular basis.


Ad Hoc Committees: Temporary Solutions for Specific Issues

In contrast to Standing Committees, Ad Hoc Committees are temporary bodies appointed for a specific purpose or task and disbanded upon completion of their mandate. These committees are constituted as the need arises to address specific issues or inquiries that may not fall within the purview of existing Standing Committees.


Key Characteristics of Ad Hoc Committees

Temporary Nature: Ad Hoc Committees are appointed for a specific duration to address a particular issue or inquiry. Once the task is completed, they are dissolved, and their members are relieved of their duties.

Narrow Focus: Ad Hoc Committees are formed to tackle specific issues or inquiries that may not be covered by existing Standing Committees. They are tailored to address the unique requirements of the situation at hand.

Task-Oriented: Ad Hoc Committees are tasked with conducting inquiries, investigations, or studies on specific issues and presenting their findings and recommendations within a stipulated timeframe.


Conclusion

In summary, while both Standing Committees and Ad Hoc Committees serve important functions in the Indian parliamentary system, they differ significantly in their composition, mandate, and duration. Standing Committees provide continuous oversight across parliamentary sessions, examining broad areas of governmental functioning, while Ad Hoc Committees are formed temporarily to address specific issues or inquiries as they arise. By understanding the distinctions between these two types of committees, we gain insight into the nuanced workings of parliamentary democracy in India and the mechanisms for effective governance and oversight.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ECI Guidelines on Election Manifestos

  The election manifesto, a crucial document outlining the promises and agenda of political parties, holds significant sway in the electoral process. However, to maintain the integrity of elections and ensure a level playing field, the Supreme Court, in its landmark judgment on July 5th, 2013, directed the Election Commission to frame guidelines for election manifestos in consultation with all recognized political parties. The Supreme Court Judgment Observed: (i) “Although, the law is obvious that the promises in the election manifesto cannot be construed as ‘corrupt practice’ under Section 123 of RP Act, the reality cannot be ruled out that distribution of freebies of any kind, undoubtedly, influences all people. It shakes the root of free and fair elections to a large degree". (ii) “The Election Commission, in order to ensure level playing field between the contesting parties and candidates in elections and also in order to see that the purity of the election process does not ge...
Post a Comment
Read more

Foreign Media Coverage of India's First General Elections

In 1951-52, India embarked on its first general election, marking a historic milestone in the country's democratic journey. This election, conducted over four months, was a remarkable event that shaped the future of Indian democracy The challenges faced by the Election Commission in organizing this massive event were immense, including illiteracy, logistics, and a population of 360 million, with 173 million eligible to vote, 85% of whom could not read or write Despite these challenges, the election was conducted with remarkable success, with 45.7% of the eligible population participating. The first general election was a significant event not only for India but also for the world. It was the largest election conducted in the world at the time, with nearly 1874 candidates and 53 political parties contesting for 489 seats The Indian National Congress, led by Jawaharlal Nehru, won a thumping majority with 364 seats and 45% of the total votes polled. The Communist Party of Indi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Model Code of Conduct for Party in Power During Elections

  In the democratic process, it's imperative for the party in power, whether at the national or state level, to maintain fairness and impartiality during elections.  The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) lays down specific guidelines to ensure that the incumbent party doesn't misuse its official position for electoral gains.  The MCC of the Election Commission of India (ECI) is a set of guidelines issued to regulate political parties and candidates prior to elections. The MCC comes into force from the date the election schedule is announced until the date that results are out. Model Code of Conduct for Party in Power During Elections: 1. Separation of Official Duties and Electioneering: Ministers are prohibited from blending their official duties with election campaign activities. They are barred from utilizing official resources or personnel for electioneering purposes. 2. Non-Partisan Use of Government Resources: Government resources such as transport, aircraft, machinery, ...
Post a Comment
Read more